Skip to Main Content

++

Make the Diagnosis: Acute Coronary Syndrome

++

Prior Probability of Acute Coronary Syndrome

++

About 13% of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain will prove to have acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

++

Population in Whom Acute Coronary Syndrome Should Be Considered

++

The use of cardiac biomarkers for ED patients with acute chest pain is now ubiquitous. This is done because the biomarkers have high sensitivity and ED physicians do not want to miss ACS. Using biomarkers, history, and electrocardiogram (ECG), ED physicians seek to categorize patients presenting to the ED with chest pain into 1 of 3 groups: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST-segment elevation ACS (which includes non-STEMI and unstable angina), and noncardiac chest pain. The ECG alone is usually sufficient for diagnosing STEMI. Identifying patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS requires the combination of clinical information and biomarkers. Biomarkers alone are not sufficient, since some patients with elevated biomarkers do not have ACS, and some patients with ACS do not have elevated biomarkers.

++

Assessing the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Syndrome

++

Individual risk factors and chest pain features do have some utility in assessing the likelihood of ACS; a prior abnormal stress test (specificity, 96%; likelihood ratio [LR], 3.1; 95% CI, 2.0-4.7), peripheral arterial disease (specificity, 97%; LR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-4.8), and pain radiation to both arms (specificity, 96%; LR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.8-3.7) were the clinical findings most suggestive of ACS, and ST-segment depression (specificity, 95%; LR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1-8.6) and any ischemia on ECG (specificity, 91%; LR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-5.7) were the most useful ECG findings (see Table 99-1). However, no individual finding is, by itself, sufficient for diagnosing or ruling out ACS. Furthermore, several studies have demonstrated that clinician gestalt alone is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude ACS or significant coronary artery disease at a clinically relevant threshold.1,2

++
Table Graphic Jump Location
Table 99-1.Useful Findings for Assessing the Likelihood of Acute Coronary Syndrome
++

Because individual historical and ECG findings are not adequate for ruling out or diagnosing ACS, risk scores have been developed (Table 99-2). Some of the features in risk scores require the clinician to interpret the meaning of patient symptoms, and those features must be assessed by ...

Want remote access to your institution's subscription?

Sign in to your MyAccess profile while you are actively authenticated on this site via your institution (you will be able to verify this by looking at the top right corner of the screen - if you see your institution's name, you are authenticated). Once logged in to your MyAccess profile, you will be able to access your institution's subscription for 90 days from any location. You must be logged in while authenticated at least once every 90 days to maintain this remote access.

Ok

About MyAccess

If your institution subscribes to this resource, and you don't have a MyAccess profile, please contact your library's reference desk for information on how to gain access to this resource from off-campus.

Subscription Options

JAMAevidence Full Site: One-Year Subscription

Connect to the full suite of JAMAevidence content and resources including interactive self-assessment, videos, and more.

$495 USD
Buy Now

Pay Per View: Timed Access to all of JAMAevidence

24 Hour Subscription $34.95

Buy Now

48 Hour Subscription $54.95

Buy Now

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.