Skip to Main Content

++

Make the Diagnosis: Abnormal Central Venous Pressure

++

Prior Probability

++

Estimating the prior probability for an elevated CVP among patients with a low ejection fraction depends on the patient's underlying condition and the effectiveness of treatment. Current treatment regimens that now include β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may decrease the prevalence of volume overload low in patients with a reduced ejection fraction. In the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction, investigators determined clinically that approximately 10% of patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction 35% or less at baseline had an elevated CVP.3, 4 Although the CVP was not invasively measured, we know that clinical assessments of a high CVP typically underestimated the true value. As a starting point, the range 10% to 20% seems like a reasonable estimate for elevated CVP among patients previously diagnosed as having a low ejection fraction.

++

The close relationship between low CVP and underlying disease makes it impossible to come up with a generally useful starting point for a pretest probability about CVP, so clinicians must use their own judgment individualized for the patient.

++

Population for Whom an Abnormal Central Venous Pressure Should Be Considered

++

  • Patients with a low left ventricular ejection fraction are at risk for a high CVP or a low CVP (eg, overdiuresis).

  • Patients with underlying acute clinical conditions that lead to volume loss may have a low CVP.

++

Detecting the Likelihood of an Abnormal Central Venous Pressure

++ ++
Table Graphic Jump Location
Table 11-6Likelihood of Abnormal Central Venous Pressure
++

Reference Standard Tests

...

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.