Skip to Main Content


Clinical Scenario



Your patient is a 78-year-old man who, at today's routine visit for the follow-up of his longstanding hypertension, is surprised to be told that his weight has decreased 10 kg since his last visit 6 months ago. He reports eating less, with little appetite but no food-related symptoms. He takes a diuretic for his hypertension, with no change in dose for more than a year, and uses acetaminophen for occasional knee pain and stiffness. He stopped smoking 11 years ago, and he stopped drinking alcohol 4 decades ago. His examination reveals him to be extremely thin but provides no localizing clues. His initial blood and urine test results are normal.

You review the long list of the possible causes of involuntary weight loss, yet you realize that an immediate exhaustive search for all possibilities is not sensible. Instead, you will seek information about the causes of involuntary weight loss that are common and most plausible in this patient.


Finding the Evidence


Using the Guide

You begin by framing your knowledge gap as a question: “In adults presenting with involuntary weight loss who undergo a diagnostic evaluation, how frequent are the important categories of underlying disease, such as neoplasms, gastrointestinal conditions, and psychiatric disorders?” As you sit at your computer to search for an answer, you notice your nearby files that store your article reprint collection. On a whim, you open the file for involuntary weight loss and find an article about the frequency of diseases in patients with involuntary weight loss that was published more than 30 years ago.1 Hoping to find some newer evidence, you access PubMed and locate this older citation in the database. Clicking the “Related Articles” link yields 92 citations, of which the second listing, by Hernandez et al,2 published in 2003, looks promising because it also explicitly addresses the frequency of underlying disorders in patients with weight loss.2 Farther down the list, you find a similar, newer study that has fewer patients,3 as well as 2 narrative review articles on unintentional weight loss,4,5 which cites the article by Hernandez et al2 as the largest of the recent studies of causes of weight loss. To double check, you scan the chapter on weight loss in an electronic text and find that no newer large study is mentioned. With some confidence that you have found recent evidence, you decide to start with the larger of the 2 studies and retrieve its full text to appraise critically.


Box 17-1 summarizes the guide for an article about disease probabilities for differential diagnosis.

Table Graphic Jump Location
BOX 17-1

Users' Guide for Articles About Disease Probability for Differential Diagnosis

Want remote access to your institution's subscription?

Sign in to your MyAccess profile while you are actively authenticated on this site via your institution (you will be able to verify this by looking at the top right corner of the screen - if you see your institution's name, you are authenticated). Once logged in to your MyAccess profile, you will be able to access your institution's subscription for 90 days from any location. You must be logged in while authenticated at least once every 90 days to maintain this remote access.


About MyAccess

If your institution subscribes to this resource, and you don't have a MyAccess profile, please contact your library's reference desk for information on how to gain access to this resource from off-campus.

Subscription Options

JAMAevidence Full Site: One-Year Subscription

Connect to the full suite of JAMAevidence content and resources including interactive self-assessment, videos, and more.

$495 USD
Buy Now

Pay Per View: Timed Access to all of JAMAevidence

24 Hour Subscription $34.95

Buy Now

48 Hour Subscription $54.95

Buy Now

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.