RT Book, Section A1 Neumann, Ignacio A1 Akl, Elie A. A1 Vandvik, Per Olav A1 Agoritsas, Thomas A1 Alonso-Coello, Pablo A1 Rind, David M. A1 Santesso, Nancy A1 Alexander, Paul Elias A1 Mustafa, Reem A. A1 Prasad, Kameshwar A1 Bates, Shannon M. A1 Schunemann, Holger J. A1 Guyatt, Gordon A2 Guyatt, Gordon A2 Rennie, Drummond A2 Meade, Maureen O. A2 Cook, Deborah J. SR Print(0) ID 1191942883 T1 How to Use a Patient Management Recommendation: Clinical Practice Guidelines and Decision Analyses T2 Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed YR 2015 FD 2015 PB McGraw-Hill Education PP New York, NY SN 978-0-07-179071-0 LK jamaevidence.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1191942883 RD 2024/10/12 AB CLINICAL SCENARIOYou are an obstetrician seeing a 31-year-old pregnant woman who had an unprovoked deep venous thrombosis of the leg 5 years ago that was treated with warfarin for 6 months without complication. She is no longer using antithrombotic medication and is otherwise healthy. Given a possible increased risk of thrombosis with pregnancy, you are considering discussing the possibility of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis for the rest of the pregnancy.To inform your discussion, you search first for an evidence-based recommendation and find the following recommendation from a practice guideline1: “For pregnant women at moderate to high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (single unprovoked VTE, pregnancy- or estrogen-related VTE, or multiple prior unprovoked VTE not receiving long-term anticoagulation), we suggest antepartum prophylaxis with prophylactic- or intermediate-dose LMWH rather than clinical vigilance or routine care (weak recommendation, based on low confidence in effect estimates).”The statement “weak recommendation, based on low confidence in effect estimates” leaves you uncomfortable. You decide to read further to understand the recommendation and its rationale.